Press Release:
Support Water Freight
I issued the following press release on 11 August
2006:
LYNNE JONES MP BACKS BIRMINGHAM
CANALS
Lynne
Jones MP has called for Government action to shift the transport of freight from our roads
to our waterways Supporting a Parliamentary
motion (text below) backing the sector, the Labour MP for Birmingham Selly Oak said,
The Case for Water,
a report by Sea and Water, a body representing the water freight industry, highlights the
potential benefits of moving more freight by water. Having
consulted West Midlands Waterways (who say that using the canal system in Birmingham, a
fully loaded tug can get from the centre of Birmingham to outlying districts in a few
hours), it is clear that moving to water freight would reduce road lorry miles, traffic
congestion, noise, exhaust pollution and damage to our road infrastructure and adjacent
buildings.
The
industry already makes a major contribution to the UKs economy, employing over
200,000 people. I am calling for action
to support the sector to allow a further shift of freight from road to water, through:
·
Reform of
the planning system to allow ports to expand and access to the waterside and to freight
handling facilities to be protected
·
The
creation of a level playing field between road transport and other modes through road
pricing
·
Support
for the strategic inland waterway network integrated with the coastal maritime ring-road
to ensure that the maximum range of destinations are served by water transport.
E N D S
Notes to
editors
West Midlands Waterways point out that
niche markets can gain great benefits by using lock-free areas of the system between
Birmingham and the outskirts of Solihull and Birmingham to Wolverhampton and Walsall for
the movement of bulk materials and non time sensitive commodities. Each boat can carry
approximately 20-25 tons. Water freight Is
quieter and exhausts a fraction of the emissions of a lorry engine. One tug can pull 4 fully loaded unpowered craft
(moving up to 80-100 tons per trip). Moving
freight by water is very efficient. The removal of just a small percentage of
lorries from the road system could have quite a dramatic impact on traffic flows in city
areas. Goods could be transported 24 hours a day or during the hours of darkness so that
any negative impact on the leisure/tourist boating market would be limited.
Text
of Early DayMotion:
EDM
1880 |
That
this House welcomes the publication of the Case for Water report by Sea and Water;
acknowledges that Sea and Water call not for long-term subsidy for the water freight
sector but a level playing field for all transport modes; recognises that the water
freight industry makes a major contribution to the UK's economy, employs more than 200,000
people and has the potential to boost the employment of British seafarers and shore staff;
notes that moving freight by water is environmentally sustainable and takes lorries off
the congested road network; believes that, with proper political encouragement, the water
freight sector can meet growing demand; acknowledges that the Government's proposed system
of road pricing will enable the true cost of road freight transport to be paid, but that
until this is instituted water freight should be supported and helped by easing the
tortuous planning procedures; and calls on the Government to back the water freight
industry with policies to develop and maintain the inland waterway network and allow the
appropriate expansion of UK ports. |