15th
November 2005
Meeting to discuss Older Peoples Mental Health
Dr Jane Garner, Faculty of Old Age Psychiatry, Royal College of Psychiatrists
Dr Garner began by noting that
everyone wants a long life but that the reality is that people dont want to be old
or vulnerable and older people often miss out on care and treatment available to younger
people. She said that the Mental Health NSF excluded people over 65 and that the Older
People NSF made little mention of mental health and consequently people often fall between
services and dont receive the care or drugs they need. Institutional abuse is a
problem, this can be at a criminal level or at a more subtle level such as patronising
people or over-medicating. A cultural and attitudinal shift is needed to improve the care
of people in homes. The czars responsible for mental health and older people have pledged
to work more closely together and work towards more respect and equity. Dr Garner also
noted that the proposal by NICE to stop the supply of certain dementia drugs through the
NHS was a symptom of the way rationing discriminates against older people.
Q&A
In response to a question from Lynne
Jones about the provision of old age psychiatry, Dr Garner said that the specialty has
existed for 30 years and has benefited the client group. However some people do fall
between the gap if they have more than one illness or if they are moving from adult to
older peoples services. Young people with dementia have traditionally fallen between
services but the Royal College and Alzheimers Society have recently produced new
guidelines for their care. There is also a discussion in the Faculty about moving from an
age-based to a needs-based system.
Baroness Murphy asked whether more
investment was needed in services for older people. She noted that the Mental Health NSF
seemed to prioritise young people with severe mental illness and that there was little
pressure to divert funds to older people and their carers particularly those living in the
community rather than in care homes. She also noted that many people in care homes have
mental health problems but this is often hidden to stop them being moved to specialist
home for dementia care. The speakers agreed with all these points.
Steve Boddington from the British
Psychological Society noted that the standards in care homes are often not high enough to
cope with those with serious mental health problems. There is not enough funding to
provide the numbers of clinical psychologists needed. He noted that Lord Layard had
recently promoted the need for more psychological therapies for people of working age but
that it was important to note that older people need this too.
The speakers from the
Alzheimers Society noted that it is often in the best interests of the patient to be
in a home with people who have the same illness as there will be the expertise to deal
with them. They also noted that there needs to be more continuity of care and a
longer-term commitment from support workers.
Louisa Stevens from the English
Community Care Association noted that care homes need more secure funding from local
authorities in order to give a more consistent level of care. She agreed that
institutional abuse needed to be stamped out.
Margaret Coombs from the office of
Evan Harris MP and the Mental Health Act Commission said that the funding process for
receiving care in older age was like a maze and put great financial pressure on families.
Prof. Nick Bosanquet brought the
debate back to the NICE decision on dementia drugs which he felt was extremely serious and
could have far reaching implications for patients. Lynne Jones noted that it was hard to
raise the publics interest in dementia drugs and that politicians seemed to have
more sympathy for drugs such as herceptin.
Other comments from the floor
included that the physical health of older people was often neglected and that this was
part of the discrimination that people face as they age. Another speaker mentioned the
problems faced by people when their care shifts from an adult team to the old age team. Dr
Garner noted that the Royal College has written guidance for its members about this
transition to improve matters.
Vicki Coombe from the
Alzheimers Society updated that group on the campaign to ensure funding for dementia
drugs. She noted that NICE was due to meet on 20th December to make its final
decision. Over 100 MPs have signed their EDM and 100,000 members of the public have sent
postcards in support of the campaign.
Lynne Jones thanked the speakers and
noted that Lord Carlile would address the next meeting in January 2006.
Present |
Apologies |
Lynne
Jones MP |
Baroness
Bottomley |
Baroness
Murphy |
Tim
Loughton MP |
Doug
Naysmith MP |
Sandra
Gidley MP |
Margaret Coombs (Office of Evan Harris
MP and MHAC) |
|
Neil Balmer (Office of Lord McNally) |
|
Agnes Wheatcroft (RCPsych) |
|
Lucy
Widenka (Rethink) |
|
Dr Roger Freeman (RCPsych) |
|
Philip Dixon-Philips (UK Fed) |
|
Dave Tombs (UK Fed) |
|
Mary Parkinson (National Pensioner
Convention) |
|
Julien Seymour (DJH) |
|
Saleem
Asaria (Cambian Group) |
|
Ros Levenson (Independent Consultant) |
|
Martin Aaron (JAMI) |
|
Robin
Hanan (Survivors speak out) |
|
John Ball (ARPOSO/EURAG) |
|
Susie Rabin (Mind) |
|
Prof. Nick Bosanquet |
|
Miranda Morland (Bruised) |
|
Vicki Coombe (Alzheimers Society) |
|
Cath OBrien (Parkinsons
Disease Society) |
|
Steve Boddington (BPS) |
|
Catherine Dooley (BPS) |
|
Ana Padilla (BPS) |
|
back to top
back to mental health |